MBA6201 Quality Management Essay Sample
Task
The purpose of this individual assessment is to com-pare and document Six-Sigma and DMAIC with other alternate approaches. The comparison must be based on the following criteria
› 1. Goal and objective
› 2. Quality measures/criteria
› 3. Implementation steps/methodology/stage
› 4. Problem-solving tools
› 5. Application area/business setting
The comparison might be based on specific case study or reference.
Your essay should have 1500 words, excluding refer- ences. It must cover the basic criteria that are required for the comparison. The essay might have important plots/diagrams/figures created by yourself or taken from any source. Note that all the references must be stated clearly and properly. Your essay should be a single word or pdf document containing your compar- ison and need to be submitted through Moodle. One submission per student.
Your essay must include:
• Title Page: The title of the assessment, name and student ID.
• Introduction: A statement of the purpose for your essay and a brief outline of your work (one or two paragraphs).
• Body of the Essay: Describe the comparison accord- ing to the criteria as mentioned in the task. The essay might include additional criteria to enrich the comparison and discussion.
• Conclusion: A summary of the points you have made in the body of the paper. The conclusion should not introduce any ‘new’ material that was not discussed in the body of the paper. (One or two paragraphs)
• References: A list of sources used in your text. They should be listed alphabetically by (first) author’s family name.
• The footer must include your name, student ID, and page number.
Solution
Introduction
Having both Six Sigma with DMAIC system as the root causes of the better assessment in the industrial processes and organizational chains is the critical period of the development of process refinement. This was the beginning of Six Sigma with the exploits of Motorola electronic engineers in the mid-1980s (Girmanová et al., 2017). In fact, it was a comprehensive approach that was molded to enhance manufacturing processes and eliminate defects and poor quality. The idea resting on statistical principals, "sigma" being an indicator that reflects the variation in processes, tries to achieve a standard, which means that only about 3.4 defects will five per million of opportunities and that is a six sigma.
Defined by an acronym, DMAIC stands for Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control. These five metrics correspond to the core of Six Sigma projects. This arrangement, based on a pre-set framework, helps organization to identify the bottlenecks of the processes, derive the root cause of defects, do upgrade where required, and establish the measures of implementation and check & control at all times (Ishak et al., 2019).This improvement potential is achieved predominantly through the incorporation statistical tools, various analysis methodologies and all the necessary data management tools for the project along with the program management techniques that continuously evolve the operational efficiency and quality in customer’s perception as well.
Regardless of its impressive global recognition, Six Sigma discovers a number of restrictions that regards its flexibility, the question to the extent to which it can be overly oriented to statistical techniques, and the significance of cultural synergy within organizational structures. This paper undergoes a comparative study of Six Sigma along with the DMAIC over the quality improvement paradigms, with the goals of clarity against the backdrop of different methodologies, strengths, limitations, and appropriateness of the numerous frameworks within a business environment (Widodo et al., 2022). The central aim of this study is to not only demonstrate to the stakeholders how to understand the methods of quality improvement but also make it more positive to operations and customers as well.
Comparison Analysis
Six Sigma and DMAIC
Six Sigma, DMAIC, and their constantly prevailing popularity highlight quality improvement techniques, as well as process optimization inside industries. The identification and thorough comprehension of the inner workings of Six Sigma as well as its core methodology (DMAIC), give organizations the ability to access structured processes (“DMAIC”) that will lead to the attainment of operational excellence and meeting the expectations of customers.
The primary purpose for university assignment help of the Six Sigma is to minimize the process variation and come up with a high level of performance when only 3.4 defects occur per million chances translating the six Sigma level (Escobar et al., 2022). The purpose of this is found in the sharpness of operational efficiency contribution as well as the provision of solutions for decreasing of costs and customer satisfaction through rigorous process improvement tasks. DMAIC, as Six Sigma tool, also borrows these objectives but adds a structure to the procedures required for the actual achievement of the objective. It aims to develop the project objectives, setup controlling the process performance, interpret the data that would provide the answer to the defects root cause, implement targeted improvements, and control the activities that maintain the improvement over time.
Six Sigma has statistical tools as its measurement basis, e.g., process defect rates, process capability indices (Cp, Cpk) and sigma levels, which are used in the assessment of a process performance. These measures objectify the quality and provide management with the quantitative data for better performance evaluation and identification of improvement options. DMAIC completes these measures providing a systematic way of gathering and analyzing data to obtain rules used to recognize process uncertainty and indicate prospects for being improved. DMAIC for continual process improvement is realized with the aid of statistical tools including histograms, control charts and regression analysis because they make decision making centered on data and prioritize process improvement plans (Sharma et al., 2018).
Six Sigma follows a structured approach comprising five phases: Establishment the DMAIC approach (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control). There is a distinct work flow for every phase that fully caters for the different challenges faced during process improvement. The Initiate phase is set up with defining projects goals and scope, while the Measure phase mainly tries to get the data used to calculate the process effectiveness (Basios et al., 2017). During Assess, people consider the data to induce necessary root causes of the defects then Improve by taking particular solutions for the problem (Chen et al., 2023). Eventually, the Control phase ensures that the tools to keep the improvements and ways for monitoring process performance are put in place and functioning further in time. DMAI lays a methodical path for Six Sigma projects implementation, which translates into one organized system in the context of the corporate's strategy.
With Six Sigma and DMAIC, the variety of approaches is limitless as it focuses on the classic tools and methods such as problem solving and analysis. Such tools range from methods of the statistical nature with Pareto analysis, Cause-and-effect diagrams, to Regression analysis and Hypothesis testing being among them (Condé et al., 2023). Not only quantitative techniques, for example, brainstorming, fishbone diagrams and process mapping are used along with the statistical analysis to ensure that any process issues are observed in local aspects.
Six Sigma and DMAIC have most importantly become multi-industry and universal tools, which are used in manufacturing, medical practice, banking, and service sector among others. Many types of organizations regardless of their size from small businesses to the big corporations have very successful experienced in implementing Six Sigma and DMAIC as the tools they greatly use to achieve process improvement and ultimately realise results towards the business. Six Sigma and DMAIC equipped with these methodologies make varied organizational contexts possible (Sharma et al., 2018). Whether about eradicating manufacturing errors, improving healthcare patients’ outcomes or streamlining financial operations, they all have one aim which is to be adaptable.
Alternative Approaches
To Six Sigma and it's DMAIC problem-solving technique, some alternative approaches to quality improvement are available; each one offers a quality that is unique and different from the other.
Total Quality Management (TQM) relies on the opposite approach to management, striving for a single quality culture in the company through the efforts of all of its employees, constituting nonstop improvement activities and encouraging teamwork and customer's focus (Rahman et al., 2018). In Lean Manufacturing, a major emphasis is placed on the removal of waste and for maximizing the flow of the processes so that there can be more efficiency and less lead time. The Agile methodology, firstly emerged in software development, places an accent on iterative and adaptive approaches to project management, hence leading to organizational flexibility, and reflecting on possible changes in established requirements.
The TOC Theory has discovered and unblocked the bottlenecks inside the processes that end up accelerating throughput as well as the achievement of the organizational objectives (Ahmed, 2019). Kaizen (which is comprised of another Japanese philosophical term meaning to ‘‘go forward’’), that is essentially programmed to strive for constant small changes in every part of the organization, can be a force for continuous improvement (which is the aspiration). The CI principles provide a range of different tools, such as PDCA approach, that helps in following the structured and systematic way of finding and working on the improvements.
Such techniques not only provide flexibility to an organization in picking suitable methodologies for their particular goals, surroundings and culture, but also ensure that an organization fulfills its goals in the best way possible. Organizations can do this by supporting assorted points of view and approaches of quality improvement. The level of challenge in a particular area and the performance will attain more improvement when the initiatives are aligned.
Challenges and Limitations
While Six Sigma and DMAIC are very efficient tools for streamlining work processes, there is a range of restraints and drawbacks which limit further adoption within an organization. A general problem is the employees' resistance to change, especially regarding the addition of new practices or approaches. Besides, this, organizations might face difficulties in gathering and analyzing the right data, especially, in chaotic and volatile environments. Another problem is the chance of an excessive dependence on statistical tools, which could leave qualitative features not addressed in the process improvement out of sight (Prashar, 2020). In addition, the time and resource-consuming character of the Six Sigma projects can be regarded as the problem, most likely in case of a small organization with financial constraints or personnel shortage. The last need is to securing ongoing dedication and cultural assimilation, which may seem to be tough in the presence of a large number of other commitments and organizational dynamism. Achieving these goals necessitates dynamic leadership, change management best practices, and the development of a corporate culture that promotes continuous education.
Conclusion
Six Sigma and its DMAIC systems, as well as other quality improvement approaches, provide business entities with useful models and tools to improving the process and satisfaction levels of both customers and supply chain actors. In the meantime, although different strategies have different advantages and shortcomings, they will be only effective if figured out how they can organize the context, set the objectives, and align them with cultural norms. Knowing the niche features and scope of these methodologies, organisations may benefit from a range of tools and mechanisms in order to have continued improvement and fulfil their sustainable business objectives. Ultimately, it has been a proven fact that embracing culture of quality and innovation, is an imperative for organizations to be able to survive and thrive in this age of technology where business is very competitive.
References
Ahmed, S. (2019). Integrating DMAIC approach of Lean Six Sigma and theory of constraints toward quality improvement in healthcare. Reviews on environmental health, 34(4), 427-434. https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/reveh-2019-0003/html
Basios, A., & Loucopoulos, P. (2017, July). Six sigma DMAIC enhanced with capability modelling. In 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI) (Vol. 2, pp. 55-62). IEEE. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8012940/
Chen, P. S., Chen, J. C. M., Huang, W. T., & Chen, H. T. (2023). Using the Six Sigma DMAIC method to improve procurement: a case study. Engineering Management Journal, 35(1), 70-83. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10429247.2022.2036067
Condé, G. C. P., Oprime, P. C., Pimenta, M. L., Sordan, J. E., & Bueno, C. R. (2023). Defect reduction using DMAIC and Lean Six Sigma: a case study in a manufacturing car parts supplier. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 40(9), 2184-2204. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2022-0157/full/html
Escobar, C. A., Macias, D., McGovern, M., Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2022). Quality 4.0–an evolution of Six Sigma DMAIC. International journal of lean six sigma, 13(6), 1200-1238. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2021-0091/full/html
Girmanová, L., Šolc, M., Kliment, J., Divoková, A., & Mikloš, V. (2017). Application of Six Sigma using DMAIC methodology in the process of product quality control in metallurgical operation. Acta technologica agriculturae, 20(4), 104-109. https://sciendo.com/pdf/10.1515/ata-2017-0020
Ishak, A., Siregar, K., & Naibaho, H. (2019, May). Quality control with Six Sigma DMAIC and grey failure mode effect anaysis (FMEA): a review. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 505, No. 1, p. 012057). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/505/1/012057/meta
Prashar, A. (2020). Adopting Six Sigma DMAIC for environmental considerations in process industry environment. The TQM Journal, 32(6), 1241-1261. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TQM-09-2019-0226/full/html
Rahman, A., Shaju, S. U. C., Sarkar, S. K., Hashem, M. Z., Hasan, S. K., & Islam, U. (2018). Application of six sigma using define measure analyze improve control (DMAIC) methodology in garment sector. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 9(3), 810-826. http://paulorodrigues.pro.br/ojs/ijmp/index.php/ijmp/article/view/732
Sharma, P., Malik, S. C., Gupta, A., & Jha, P. C. (2018). A DMAIC Six Sigma approach to quality improvement in the anodising stage of the amplifier production process. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(9), 1868-1880. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0155/full/html
Sharma, R., Gupta, P., & Saini, V. (2018). Six sigma DMAIC Methodology Implementation in Automobile industry: A case study. Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 13(1), 042-050. http://www.smenec.org/index.php/1/article/view/103
Widodo, A., & Soediantono, D. (2022). Benefits of the six sigma method (dmaic) and implementation suggestion in the defense industry: A literature review. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 3(3), 1-12. https://ijosmas.org/index.php/ijosmas/article/view/138
Would you like to schedule a callback?
Send us a message and we will get back to you
Highlights
Earn While You Learn With Us
Confidentiality Agreement
Money Back Guarantee
Live Expert Sessions
550+ Ph.D Experts
21 Step Quality Check
100% Quality
24*7 Live Help
On Time Delivery
Plagiarism-Free
81 Isla Avenue Glenroy, Mel, VIC, 3046 AU
