DSMG29002 Leadership in Emergency and Disaster Management Report 2 Sample
Task Description
Assessment task two entails a comprehensive exploration of leadership within emergency and disaster management. Specifically, youll need to delve deeply into various leadership theories and styles and critically assess their relevance and application in the context of emergency and disaster management scenarios. This exploration should encompass a detailed examination of how these leadership concepts are practically implemented and their effectiveness in addressing the unique challenges of emergencies and disasters.
The following are points you should address in your assessment:
1. Examine three (3) leadership theories and styles that are important for emergency and disaster management, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Elucidate why these particular approaches are uniquely suitable for emergency and disaster contexts.
2. Discuss how leadership strategies in emergency and disaster management differ from those in more routine, non-crisis environments.
3. Analyse the role of effective leadership in shaping the overall management and outcome of disaster situations.
4. Critically evaluate various leadership strategies and their effectiveness in emergency and disaster management, drawing on real-life examples or case studies to demonstrate their application and impact.
Your response must be supported by appropriate literature and referenced accordingly. Please see the marking rubric for further guidance. You are free to present the response in a written format that best suits you; however, you must respond to each requirement (2000 words in total).
Presentation guidelines:
• Referencing: All sources must be cited and referenced appropriately throughout this task in the correct APA 7th Edition style; ensure that you use the CQU Library guide for APA style.
• Word count: 2000 words +/-10%, excluding the cover page, in-text citations, the reference list and appendices. Calculate your word count minus exclusions prior to submission and include this on the cover page.
• File format: Submit your document in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx).
• Grading rubric: Please refer to the Moodle site for additional assessment information, such as the assignment marking rubric and template.
• Turnitin: All submissions are subject to Turnitin scans, and all Turnitin reports are scrutinised. All instances of plagiarism are reported to the Academic.
Solution
Introduction
Leadership within emergency and disaster management is of significance because it could impact the efficiency of response to a critical situation or the result thereof. These situations require much more than making fast decisions; they also demand the vision, tenacity, and charisma to move a team forward and hold it together under stress (Cao et al., 2022). Therefore, the stakes are extremely high for making a choice of leadership theory and style suitable for such high-pressure situations. Great leadership can tremendously change the trajectory of efforts made in disaster response, in the immediate and long-term strategies for recovery ((Lin et al., 2022, p. 617).
The essay will further address some of the leadership theories and styles in relevance and practicality with applying them in emergency and disaster management. The first section looks at three key leadership styles: transformational, situational, and servant leadership, explaining the attributes or features attached to each style. The following section determines whether these styles are relevant in a disaster situation and the reason why. The following area contrasts the leadership strategies of routine, noncrisis, and emergency or disaster situations. The third section looks at a critical leadership of an effective leader in disaster management and outcomes. Finally, this essay brings out a number of critical analysis strategies present in real-life experiences in some parts of the world, giving a practical and wide application of the impact and effectiveness of these strategies in crises.
Section 1: Examination of Leadership Theories and Styles
In relation to emergency and disaster management, effective leadership can significantly determine immediate response and recovery efficiency. There are three essential leadership theories, that is, Transformational, Situational, and Servant Leadership, which while applied in such high pressure settings have unique advantages though presented with specific challenges for university assignment help.
i. Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership is the ability of a leader to be able to motivate and inspire followers to transcend their personal interests for the betterment of the community (Kwok et al., 2022, p.22). In view of this, visionary, charismatic, and passionate leaders can best communicate purpose and direction in times of crisis. Such leaders motivate their teams toward action better with a climate of enthusiasm and energy, which is very important in times of emergency that require prompt and firm action. Since it aligns the values of the team members to the mission, the transformation approach is very helpful in rallying the teams around crises and overcoming resistance to change.
Advantages: Transformational leaders guarantee the performance-based culture with a maximum innovation and change. This may result in increased morale within the team and a rise in the level of effectiveness for coping with emergencies.
Disadvantages: It may place over-reliance on the leader's vision and direction, stifling individual decision-making by the team members themselves, which can be quite critical in rapidly changing disaster scenarios.
ii. Situational Leadership
The theory of situational leadership is all about a leader being adaptable and changing the style of his leadership according to the severity and nature of the situation. The theory will be applicable in disaster management, whereby a leader has to be ready to change according to the change in circumstances (Lin et al., 2022). The situational leader changes the use of directive, coaching, supporting, and delegating behaviors, depending on the level of competence and commitment of the followers.
Advantages: The real strength of situational leadership lies in its flexibility and responsiveness to enable leaders to cope with the fast-changing needs of the disaster management process.
Disadvantages: It is such a challenge for the leader to be able to accurately read the situation and the readiness of his team all the time. Misjudgments can lead to inappropriate leadership styles that may hinder the response effort.
iii. Servant Leadership
Although the servant leadership revolves around giving more priority to the needs of others, it mainly focuses on the well-being and development of team members and other stakeholders. Such a leadership approach matters greatly during disasters, when the safety and well-being of the populations in distress are the utmost priorities. Servant leaders are highly empathetic and committed to supporting others, building community and mutual trust (Khan et al., 2022, p. 849).
Advantages: This style goes a long way to ensure long-term engagement and trust between the teams and the affected communities and, therefore, is critical to the success of the ongoing disaster recovery efforts (Khan et al., 2022, p. 850).
Disadvantages: The major one is that the focus on the other person's needs might take more time and delay decisions, or make them less assertive, which does not function well in cases of urgent disaster response, where quick and firm decisions are needed..
Section 2: Leadership Differences in Crisis vs. Routine Environments
Leadership during emergency varies fundamentally from leadership during a stable, normal situation due to the demands and pressures brought by the different kinds of situations. These differences are germane for understanding why certain skills and qualities might be accentuated or required during a crisis compared to the normal setting of every day management.
• Quick Decision-Making
With rapid and correct action, leaders often face a situation of emergency in the event of averting the crisis impact. Thus, a leadership style must be one that rapidly assesses critical situations, interprets right decisions on time, and brings about an effective action. In routine environments, on the other hand, leaders in general have the luxury of time to study situations thoroughly and consult with teams and regarding long-term implications before deciding on the most appropriate action to take. The pace is more measured, allowing for detailed strategic planning and careful deliberation.
• High Stress Endurance
Emergencies are high-pressure circumstances that require a massive load of psychological resilience and emotional stability on the part of leaders. It is important that leaders are able to keep up, think straight under pressure, and hold themselves confidently, as this will directly affect the morale of the team and their effectiveness. Not only must the leader handle the logistical elements of the crisis but also the human emotions and responses that come with high-stress conditions. In contrast, leadership in routine settings typically experiences lower levels of constant and predictable stress, involving the maintenance of steady performance and the handling of day-to-day operations without the intense, immediate pressures present within crisis environments.
• Strong Communication
This is when communication in a crisis has to be explicit, precise, and timely. Effective leaders will ensure that critical information is cascaded down to all concerned at the earliest possible moment in the right and orchestrated manner to act accordingly. Communication is not only for the orders to be released but should also serve to reassure and inspire an anxious and stressed team (Mercader et al., 2021, p. 522). While communication lies at the heart of effective leadership in routine environments, there is much more opportunity for exploration, long-term relationship building, and team dynamics over a period of time. The communication can be more exploratory in nature, aimed at encouraging innovation and participation across all levels of the organization.
The difference between crisis and non-crisis leadership highlights the level of flexibility and skills required by a leader. When one faces emergencies, the attention needed includes immediacy, resilience, and directive communication—all in the hope of a rapid and effective response. In a stable environment, leadership can afford to be more reflective, with the associated strategic thinking broader and deeper team engagement.
Section 3: Role of Effective Leadership in Disaster Management
Disaster management is the process where leadership proves effective and directly influences the process and results of responding to an emergency. Decisions that have to be taken by leaders in such contexts will have an extensive impact on the net effects of the disasters and the path to recovery (Hung et al., 2024, p. 5). Some of the important qualities of leadership are decisiveness, strategic vision, and emotional intelligence in leading complex disaster situations.
• Decisive Action
Speed is, therefore, of the essence in coming up with a decision within the disaster. Leaders are obligated to quickly evaluate the situation, come up with a decision, and respond by equally ensuring that the resources and personnel are mobilized. Such a response will lessen the impacts of a disaster, as the responses will have been prompt and correct. For instance, in a natural calamity, leaders will quickly make a decision on whether to evacuate, provide emergency aid, and reallocate the available resources to the key areas Hung et al., 2024, p. 6). The way and how first these decisions are acted upon will immensely be a determinant factor to the success of response efforts, thus saving lives and limiting further damage.
• Strategic Vision
Strategic vision can be explained as being conversant with the challenges and opportunities that may come forth in the process of recovery. Clear vision by the leaders will help in providing the direction towards recovery, prioritizing needs that meet the goals of long-term recovery with the fulfillment of immediate needs. They will therefore be able to manage not only the current situation but also prepare for risks in the future. Strategic vision is important in the planning of the reconstruction of infrastructure, revitalization of communities, and implementation of programs that enhance preparedness in managing disasters in the future
• Emotional Intelligence
This dimension of emotional intelligence becomes critically important in disaster management: in addition to managing one's own stress and emotions, leaders must manage others' stress and emotions. Good leaders are sensitive, effective communicators, and prudent managers of relationships. They should be able to connect and extend support to their work teams and the communities they serve based on the observed emotional context and keep spirits up (Bonfanti et al., 2024, p. 29). Emotional attunement helps keep motivation and team cohesion, which is important during the intense, often drawn-out recovery periods.
Section 4: Critical Evaluation of Leadership Strategies
There are critical lessons in evaluating leadership strategies under the circumstance of great disaster with respect to what works and what may falter under pressure. Perhaps the best way to illuminate this concept is through examination of two standout examples of the impacts of leadership decisions under crisis: the response to Hurricane Katrina and the 2011 Japan tsunami and nuclear disaster.
• Hurricane Katrina
The response to Hurricane Katrina in 2005 is often criticized for its leadership failures at various government levels. There was never a coordinated disaster response between the federal, state, and local government levels. This failure to act during the acute hours magnified the effect of the disaster on the people. Add to this the fact that the catastrophe was so underreported, and lack of mobilization of enough resources by the leadership at an early stage led to suffering and chaos (Garaad, 2023). This case shows that in disaster leadership, there is dire need for communication and coordination, while at the same time it portrays the dangers of complacency and lack of preparedness.
• 2011 Japan Tsunami and Nuclear Disaster
In contrast, the leadership response to the 2011 Japan tsunami and subsequent Fukushima nuclear disaster did show some more effective response in some areas, particularly in the area of readiness and immediate response. The Japanese leadership had been known for strong disaster preparedness schemes, and in this tsunami crisis, they were able to mobilize evacuation quickly and saved numerous lives (Koshimura & Shuto, 2015, p.4). The nuclear crisis that developed came with its own set of challenges. The first response as to how the nuclear disaster at Fukushima was initially managed showed crises of communication and transparency, leading to public distrust..
Lessons Learned
From these cases, it is patently clear that proactive preparedness followed by decisive action is the key to disaster management. Strong, coordinated effective leadership should prevail in good two-way communication, taking a balanced approach in resource management during a crisis. The imperatives of transparency and building trust are cardinal to long-term recovery and the management of public morale and cooperation. Such examples do indicate the need for a comprehensive approach that brings together preparedness, response, and recovery strategies under effective leadership.
Conclusion
Effective leadership is important in emergency and disaster management. The leadership provided will determine the effective outcome of response efforts and the effectiveness of crises. The paper will highlight the main leadership styles in disaster management: transformational, situational, and servant, all of which have unique strengths. Analysis of leadership in the crisis versus the everyday environment underlines the need for fast decision-making, resilience, and clear communication in case of emergencies. Real-life cases, like Hurricane Katrina and the Japanese tsunami, once again revealed the need for coordination of action, decisiveness, and transparency. Overall, the continuous research and training in these leadership styles will enhance future crisis response capacity to ensure that leaders are well versed to manage the complexities of disaster scenarios.
References
Bonfanti, R. C., Oberti, B., Ravazzoli, E., Rinaldi, A., Ruggieri, S., & Schimmenti, A. (2024). The Role of Trust in Disaster Risk Reduction: A Critical Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010029
Cao, W., Li, P., C. van der Wal, R., & W. Taris, T. (2022). Leadership and Workplace Aggression: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 186(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05184-0
Garaad, Y. (2023, November 16). How Hurricane Katrina changed disaster preparedness. Scalawag. https://scalawagmagazine.org/2023/11/hurricane-katrina-disaster-preparedness/
Hung, K. K. C., MacDermot, M. K., Hui, T. S. I., Chan, S. Y., Mashino, S., Mok, C. P. Y., Leung, P. H., Kayano, R., Abrahams, J., Wong, C. S., Chan, E. Y. Y., & Graham, C. A. (2024). Mapping study for health emergency and disaster risk management competencies and curricula: literature review and cross-sectional survey. Globalization and Health, 20(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-023-01010-y
Khan, M. M., Mubarik, M. S., Ahmed, S. S., Islam, T., & Khan, E. (2022). The contagious servant leadership: exploring the role of servant leadership in leading employees to servant colleagueship. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-06-2021-0305
Koshimura, S., & Shuto, N. (2015). Response to the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami disaster. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373(2053). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0373
Kwok, M. L. J., Kwong, R., Wong, M., & Duan, J. (2022). Great leaders do everything: a moderated mediation model of transformational leadership, trust in leader, helping behaviour, and idiosyncratic deals. Asian Business & Management, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-022-00178-2
Lin, M., Wu, X., & Li, X. (2022). Who are the Empowered Employees: Those with High Work Performance or High Ethical Behavior? Journal of Business Ethics, 186(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05232-9
Mercader, V., Galván-Vela, E., Ravina-Ripoll, R., & Popescu, C. R. Gh. (2021). A Focus on Ethical Value under the Vision of Leadership, Teamwork, Effective Communication and Productivity. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(11), 522.
Shukla, D., Azad, H. K., Abhishek, K., & Shitharth, S. (2023). Disaster management ontology- an ontological approach to disaster management automation. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 8091. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34874-6
Would you like to schedule a callback?
Send us a message and we will get back to you
Highlights
Earn While You Learn With Us
Confidentiality Agreement
Money Back Guarantee
Live Expert Sessions
550+ Ph.D Experts
21 Step Quality Check
100% Quality
24*7 Live Help
On Time Delivery
Plagiarism-Free
81 Isla Avenue Glenroy, Mel, VIC, 3046 AU
