DSMG29001 Disaster Risk Reduction Report Sample
Assessment Details
You are a disaster risk management specialist tasked with applying the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction to a specific community. Your report should be 3000 words (10% deviation accepted) and address, at a minimum, the following points:
1. Overview of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.
2. Purpose of the Sendai Framework in guiding disaster risk reduction efforts at various levels, including the community level.
3. Introduce the specific community that will be the focus of the assessment.
4. Identify and assess the hazards that pose a risk to the community, considering both natural and human-induced hazards.
5. Evaluate the vulnerability of the community to the identified hazards.
6. Evaluate the existing capacities and resources within the community that can be utilised for disaster risk reduction.
Assessment Formatting and Structure:
Content:
• Sections: Your assessment should contain at a minimum the following sections: Cover Page, Introduction, Report body, Conclusion, and Reference List. (You may add subsections to the body if you wish.)
• Topic: Your report should focus on the chosen community. This should not be a shallow summary of but a deeper discussion of the topic using recent literature to support your points.
• Style: This task requires writing at a professional standard, with information presented in a clear & logical sequence, and writen in academic style with correct grammar, syntax, and spelling.
• Citations & references: All statements must be correctly cited and referenced in APA 7th Edition style, using reference sources appropriate to the task level.
Guidance Notes for Assessment 1
Conducting a disaster risk assessment involves a systematic process of identifying, analysing, and evaluating the risks and vulnerabilities faced by a community in relation to potential hazards.
1. Introduction:
• Provide a brief overview of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction.
• Explain the purpose of the framework in guiding disaster risk reduction efforts at various levels, including the community level.
• Introduce the specific community that will be the focus of the assessment.
2. Understanding the Community:
• Describe the geographical, social, economic, and cultural aspects of the community.
• Identify any specific characteristics that may influence its vulnerability to hazards and potential impacts.
3. Hazard Assessment:
• Identify and assess the hazards that pose a risk to the community, considering both natural and human-induced hazards.
• Analyse the frequency, intensity, and potential consequences of these hazards.
• Consider the historical occurrence of past disasters in the community.
4. Vulnerability Assessment:
• Evaluate the vulnerability of the community to the identified hazards.
• Identify the exposed elements, such as population, infrastructure, and critical facilities, and assess their susceptibility to damage or disruption.
• Consider the social, economic, and environmental factors that contribute to the community's vulnerability.
5. Capacity Assessment:
• Evaluate the existing capacities and resources within the community that can be utilised for disaster risk reduction.
• Identify strengths and weaknesses in terms of governance, institutional frameworks, infrastructure, community networks, and response capabilities.
• Consider the level of awareness and preparedness within the community.
6. Risk Identification and Analysis:
• Integrate the hazard, vulnerability, and capacity assessments to identify and prioritise specific risks faced by the community.
• Quantify and qualify the risks based on their likelihood and potential consequences.
• Consider the interdependencies and cascading effects of multiple hazards.
Remember, the Sendai Framework provides a comprehensive approach to disaster risk reduction, emphasising the importance of understanding and addressing underlying risk drivers and building resilience at the community level. Adapt the process to the specific context of your chosen community.
Solution
Introduction
A historic global accord, the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction was created in 2015 during the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in Sendai, Japan. Compared to the Hyogo Framework, this framework marks a paradigm shift and lays out high goals and priorities for the years 2015–2030. The framework is closely aligned with global programs like the Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Climate Agreement, as it is based on the understanding that catastrophe risk management is essential to sustainable development. The Sendai Framework helps communities and countries negotiate the challenges of sustainable development, disaster risk reduction, and climate change adaptation. It places a strong emphasis on constructing resilience holistically, integrating corporations, governments, civil society, and communities. The framework provides a coherent approach to reducing the effect of catastrophes by defining four action priorities: improving preparedness, investing in risk reduction, increasing governance, and understanding disaster risk for university assignment help.
The framework takes on a unique significance at the community level. This evaluation focuses on an urban slum neighborhood, which serves as a microcosm of the complex difficulties marginalized populations have in quickly urbanizing regions. The urban slum is a manifestation of socioeconomic weaknesses, inadequate housing, healthcare issues, and social dynamics that increase the vulnerability to natural and man-made disasters. By thoroughly investigating this community, the evaluation seeks to implement the Sendai Framework's tenets by analyzing its risks, capabilities, and possible approaches to disaster risk reduction. By doing this, it hopes to further the conversation on sustainable development and community-driven resilience in the face of changing obstacles.
Overview of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
A historic international agreement designed to direct efforts worldwide to lessen the impact of disasters on communities and societies is the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction, which was adopted in 2015 during the Third UN World Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction in Sendai, Japan. The framework, which recognizes the interconnectedness between disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation, and sustainable development, represents a paradigm shift from the preceding Hyogo Framework. It lays forth audacious objectives and top priorities for the 15-year period between 2015 and 2030.
One of the fundamental tenets of the Sendai Framework is the recognition that catastrophe risk management is a prerequisite for sustainable development. It emphasizes how important it is to take a holistic approach to building resilience, encompassing communities, governments, local government agencies, businesses, and civil society (Busayo et al., 2020). Recognizing the interdependence of global issues, the framework is in close alignment with other international accords, such the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Paris Climate Agreement.
The framework offers a thorough and coordinated approach to catastrophe risk reduction by outlining four action priorities:
Understanding Disaster Risk
• The framework places a strong emphasis on the necessity of having a thorough awareness of the risk landscape, which includes identifying risks, vulnerabilities, and disaster exposure.
• It encourages the efficient assessment and communication of risk by the application of scientific knowledge, common sense, and community-based methods.
Strengthening Governance for Risk Reduction
• The Sendai Framework promotes the creation and bolstering of institutions, laws, and policies at the municipal, national, and regional levels in recognition of the crucial role that governance plays.
• It promotes cross-sector cooperation and incorporates risk mitigation into development planning procedures.
Investing in Disaster Risk Reduction for Resilience
• The framework suggests investing more in risk-reduction strategies in order to improve ecosystems, infrastructure, and community resilience (Mizutori, 2020).
• It encourages public and private sector investment decisions to take risk minimization into account.
Enhancing Disaster Preparedness
• Effective risk reduction is said to depend heavily on preparedness, which includes response plans, early warning systems, and recovery strategies.
• The framework emphasizes how crucial community involvement is in preparation efforts, making sure that those who are most vulnerable are taken into account.
The Sendai Framework is based on the idea of leaving no one behind, with a specific emphasis on meeting the needs of the most marginalized and vulnerable groups. The framework acknowledges the dynamic and heterogeneous character of catastrophe risk and offers a roadmap that is adaptable and flexible, enabling nations and communities to customize their approaches to suit their particular situation (Yang et al., 2019). It acts as a call to action for the global community to cooperate in the direction of a more sustainable and resilient future, in which the effects of disasters are lessened and communities are able to prosper in the face of changing difficulties.
Purpose of the Sendai Framework at the Community Level
The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction acknowledges the necessity of a bottom-up approach to disaster risk reduction as well as the vital role that communities play in a country's overall resilience (Maly & Suppasri, 2020). The framework fulfills a number of vital functions at the community level, including coordinating efforts with regional settings and encouraging a sense of empowerment and ownership among community members.
Inclusivity and Community Engagement
The framework places a strong emphasis on involving all stakeholders in order to make sure that community members' voices especially those of those who have historically been marginalized are heard. The framework advocates for active resident participation in decision-making processes in urban slum communities, where disasters frequently disproportionately affect vulnerable groups. This inclusivity acknowledges the community's varied demands, backgrounds, and expertise.
Localization of Risk Reduction Efforts
Communities have varying degrees of disaster risk, and the Sendai Framework promotes localizing risk reduction initiatives. This entails adjusting tactics to the unique risks and weaknesses that every community faces. This could entail dealing with problems including poor housing, limited access to sanitary facilities and clean water, and inadequate healthcare services in the case of urban slums. The framework guarantees that interventions are pertinent and successful by tailoring strategies to the local environment.
Integration into Development Planning
The framework's incorporation of catastrophe risk reduction into all levels of development planning is one of its main features (Chmutina et al., 2021). This translates, locally, to incorporating risk reduction strategies into neighborhood development projects. This could entail tackling the underlying reasons of vulnerability, such as poverty and social inequality, pushing for better infrastructure, and integrating resilience-building strategies into urban planning for the urban slum community.
Capacity Building and Knowledge Sharing
The Sendai Framework acknowledges that communities actively contribute to their own resilience rather than being passive beneficiaries of aid. As a result, it encourages the development of community capacity, giving people the ability to recognize, evaluate, and control their own risks. This could entail offering emergency preparedness training, sharing knowledge about nearby dangers, and encouraging a spirit of camaraderie among residents of urban slums.
Protection of the Most Vulnerable
The framework recognizes that particular groups may be disproportionately affected by disasters and places specific emphasis on protecting the most vulnerable communities. This entails giving special consideration to the needs of women, children, the elderly, and those with disabilities in the urban slum community. It is important to develop strategies to guarantee that these groups have equitable access to resources, data, and decision-making procedures.
.png)
Source (Sendai Framework for DRR, n.d.)
Introduction to the Urban Slum Community
The urban slum neighborhood that is the subject of this catastrophe risk reduction study is a microcosm of the intricate problems that marginalized groups in quickly urbanizing places encounter. This town, which is tucked away on the fringes of a busy metropolis, is distinguished by its crowded informal settlements, poor infrastructure, and restricted access to essential services (Wolff, 2021). This slum's inhabitants frequently struggle with social marginalization, poverty, and increased susceptibility to a wide range of man-made and natural disasters.
Socio-Economic Dynamics
This urban slum's ubiquitous and distinctive attribute is poverty. Many citizens work in irregular and insecure jobs and live on the periphery of the formal economy. Restricted access to education limits prospects for upward mobility and feeds the poverty cycle even more. Vulnerability is increased by unstable economies because people may find it difficult to reconstruct their lives after calamities.
Housing and Living Conditions
The slum's housing stock is made up of improvised buildings made from discarded materials that provide no weather protection. Living in tiny spaces with several families is a common problem known as overcrowding. These circumstances make it easier for disasters to spread quickly, which increases the effect of risks like flooding and fires.
Healthcare Challenges
Concerns about healthcare access are prevalent in the slum population. Increased susceptibility to disease outbreaks is a result of insufficient sanitation infrastructure and a shortage of healthcare facilities (van Niekerk et al., 2020). The lack of appropriate waste disposal systems increases the hazards to public health and fosters an atmosphere where diseases can spread quickly.
Social Dynamics and Marginalization
There is widespread social vulnerability, with some groups being disproportionately vulnerable. Specially women and children may be more vulnerable since they have less access to economic, healthcare, and educational possibilities. These marginalized groups experience additional difficulties as a result of discrimination and social exclusion, which makes it more difficult for them to actively engage in community-driven disaster risk reduction activities.
Infrastructure Deficiencies
One of the biggest problems facing the urban slum community is the absence of essential infrastructure. When it rains a lot, the community is more vulnerable to floods due to inadequate drainage systems and badly built roads. Unplanned urbanization has resulted from a lack of official planning and land-use laws, which has further compromised the community's ability to withstand numerous threats.
.png)
Source (Covid-19: Formalise Urban Slums for Long-Term Resilience, 2020)
Identify and Assess Hazards in the Urban Slum Community
Natural Hazards
• Flooding: The low-lying urban slum neighborhood frequently lacks adequate drainage infrastructure. Flooding is more likely to occur during periods of high rainfall or storms. The lack of appropriate urban planning and poorly built homes make the town more susceptible to flooding (Nkwunonwo et al., 2020). In addition to directly endangering locals, floodwaters have the potential to contaminate water sources and raise the risk of waterborne illnesses.
• Fires: Conditions that facilitate the quick spread of fires are created by the slum community's informal and closely packed housing. Given the close proximity of buildings and the prevalence of flammable materials in construction, a fire in one location can swiftly spread to nearby properties. The risk of fires is increased when people have restricted access to emergency services and firefighting equipment, which could lead to serious property loss and injury to locals.
Human-Induced Hazards
• Disease Outbreaks: The urban slum community is particularly vulnerable to disease outbreaks due to inadequate sanitary facilities and restricted access to healthcare. Living situations that are very crowded aid in the quick spread of infectious diseases. Furthermore, poor waste management techniques pollute the environment and serve as a haven for disease-transmitting vectors like cholera and dengue. In this situation, improving cleanliness and fortifying the healthcare system are essential elements of catastrophe risk reduction.
• Unplanned Urbanization: Buildings are constructed haphazardly and without following safety codes in the slum community as a result of rapid and unplanned urbanization. As a result, the community is more physically exposed to dangers. Inadequate land-use planning also leads to the encroachment on regions that are vulnerable to geological hazards, including steep slopes or riverbanks, which increases the community's risk of landslides and other natural disasters (Vilar-Compte et al., 2021). To tackle these problems, a comprehensive strategy integrating infrastructure development, community involvement, and urban planning is needed.
• Social and Economic Vulnerability: The community's pre-existing socio-economic vulnerabilities are exacerbated by the dangers that have been identified. Extreme poverty makes it difficult for locals to build durable homes or to get access to healthcare and education. The emergence of informal settlements, which are typified by poor living circumstances, is frequently caused by a lack of regular employment possibilities. Due to gender differences in decision-making and resource availability, women and children may be more vulnerable than other groups.
Evaluate Vulnerability of the Urban Slum Community
Vulnerability assessment serves as the cornerstone for focused efforts to reduce the risk of disaster and is an essential first step in comprehending the unique difficulties that the urban slum community faces. Vulnerabilities in this society are multifaceted, encompassing social, physical, and economic aspects, making natural and man-made disasters more severe.
• Socio-Economic Vulnerability: The ubiquitous poverty that characterizes the urban slum community greatly increases its susceptibility to natural disasters. It is difficult for locals to invest in robust infrastructure or obtain high-quality housing due to a lack of economic prospects, poor income levels, and unstable employment situations. Their inability to pay for resources limits their capacity to deal with and recover from the effects of disasters (Corburn et al., 2020). Inadequate education also feeds a vicious cycle of vulnerability by preventing members of the community from pursuing possibilities for upward mobility and skill development.
• Physical Vulnerability: The community is more physically vulnerable due to cramped living quarters and inadequate housing constructions. There is a higher chance of collapse during earthquakes or other structural stresses in many non-code-compliant dwellings. Flooding and the spread of waterborne illnesses are made more likely by inadequate drainage and sanitation infrastructure. Furthermore, the community's physical resilience is further compromised by the tight, crowded passageways and lack of green spaces, which make evacuation and emergency response attempts more difficult.
• Social Vulnerability: The urban slum community's marginalized condition makes it susceptible to social weaknesses. During disasters, women, children, and other underprivileged groups within the community bear disproportionate consequences (Leal Filho et al., 2019). Women are more vulnerable when it comes to healthcare and reproductive services, and children are more likely to experience disruptions in their schooling and health concerns. Despite its promise, social solidarity can become strained in times of crisis, particularly when resources are limited. In order to achieve inclusivity and fair disaster risk reduction measures, discrimination and exclusion must be addressed because they exacerbate social vulnerabilities within the community.
A multifaceted strategy that takes into account the distinct socioeconomic, physical, and social characteristics of the urban slum community is required to address these vulnerabilities. Long-term resilience can be achieved by making investments in education, affordable housing, and livelihood possibilities, which will end the cycle of vulnerability and poverty. Enhancing social inclusion, expanding access to healthcare, and building better infrastructure can also enable a community to survive and recover from the effects of disasters (Mishra et al., 2020). To ensure the durability and efficacy of the initiatives, any disaster risk reduction approach for this community must be participative, recognize the inhabitants as active players in the process, and incorporate their opinions.
.png)
Source (Pandey et al., 2018)
Evaluate Existing Capacities and Resources
• Community Networks and Social Capital: The community's strong social fabric and connection are among its most valuable features. For disaster risk reduction to be effective, community networks must be established and strengthened (Wang et al., 2021). These networks can act as channels for information sharing, resource mobilization, and emergency response coordination. In order to fully utilize this social capital, local community leaders, influencers, and social groups are essential. Prioritizing efforts to improve communication channels and promote community cohesion is a good idea.
• Local Leadership and Governance: One important tactic is to find and support local leaders in the community. These leaders, who frequently arise naturally, can be extremely important in disaster preparedness and response because they have important insights into the dynamics of the community. Local leaders can improve their ability to organize reaction or evacuation activities, communicate risk information, and mobilize resources by participating in training programs. Initiatives for risk reduction that are more successful and long-lasting are those that use collaborative governance models and involve community leaders in decision-making.
• Micro-enterprises and Livelihood Opportunities: Many people in the urban slum community depend on their microenterprises for income despite the economic difficulties. Supporting and acknowledging these endeavors can help promote economic resiliency. Strategies for disaster risk reduction may look into how to improve currently operating microenterprises or launch new ones that complement the abilities and resources of the local community (Dong et al., 2020). This increases economic sustainability and offers alternate sources of revenue both during and after calamities.
• Traditional Knowledge and Coping Mechanisms: Communities frequently possess priceless coping skills and traditional knowledge that has been handed down through the years. This expertise includes resource management, indigenous building methods, and adaptive activities tied to regional weather patterns. Plans for disaster risk reduction that incorporate traditional knowledge guarantee culturally aware and situation-specific strategies. As their knowledge is recognized and included into risk reduction programs, it also fosters a sense of empowerment and ownership within the community.
• Education and Awareness Initiatives: Even though there might not be many educational opportunities, community investments in awareness and education campaigns can pay off in the long run. Increasing community knowledge of disaster hazards, preparedness strategies, and evacuation protocols improves the community's capacity to react (Peters, 2020). Education also gives community members the ability to speak up for their own demands and rights, which promotes a proactive strategy for lowering the risk of disaster.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the urban slum community's implementation of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction highlights the urgent need for a community-centric strategy in addressing vulnerabilities and boosting resilience. Understanding disaster risk, bolstering governance, investing in risk reduction for resilience, and improving preparedness are the four action objectives of the framework that offer a strong basis for customized interventions in the context of urban slums. Recognizing the dynamic and varied character of disaster risk, the framework is in perfect alignment with international endeavors like the Paris Climate Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals. Within the context of urban slum communities, which are marked by deficient infrastructure, healthcare inequities, and socio-economic difficulties, the Sendai Framework promotes integration, inclusion, localization, and capacity building in development planning. The vulnerability assessment uncovers complex issues with socioeconomic, physical, and social components. The framework places particular emphasis on protecting the most vulnerable populations, such as women, children, and people with disabilities. Effective disaster risk reduction emphasizes the need of leveraging the community's already-existing capacities and resources, such as robust social networks, local leadership, microenterprises, and traditional knowledge. The community's capacity to react proactively to threats is further strengthened by the inclusion of education and awareness activities.
Reference
Busayo, E. T., Kalumba, A. M., Afuye, G. A., Ekundayo, O. Y., & Orimoloye, I. R. (2020). Assessment of the Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction studies since 2015. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 50, 101906. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420920314084
Chmutina, K., von Meding, J., Sandoval, V., Boyland, M., Forino, G., Cheek, W., ... & Marchezini, V. (2021). What we measure matters: the case of the missing development data in Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction monitoring. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 12, 779-789. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-021-00382-2
Corburn, J., Vlahov, D., Mberu, B., Riley, L., Caiaffa, W. T., Rashid, S. F., ... & Ayad, H. (2020). Slum health: arresting COVID-19 and improving well-being in urban informal settlements. Journal of urban health, 97, 348-357. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11524-020-00438-6
Covid-19: Formalise urban slums for long-term resilience. (2020, June 7). Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/covid-19-formalise-urban-slums-for-long-term-resilience/story-XxVpRQvMNMiLbnmaALXbQO.html
Dong, S., Esmalian, A., Farahmand, H., & Mostafavi, A. (2020). An integrated physical-social analysis of disrupted access to critical facilities and community service-loss tolerance in urban flooding. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 80, 101443. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019897151930434X
Leal Filho, W., Balogun, A. L., Olayide, O. E., Azeiteiro, U. M., Ayal, D. Y., Muñoz, P. D. C., ... & Li, C. (2019). Assessing the impacts of climate change in cities and their adaptive capacity: Towards transformative approaches to climate change adaptation and poverty reduction in urban areas in a set of developing countries. Science of the Total Environment, 692, 1175-1190. https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/627232/1/Deposit.Assessing%20the%20Impacts%20of%20Climate%20Change%20in%20Cities%20and%20their%20Adaptive%20Capacity.pdf
Maly, E., & Suppasri, A. (2020). The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction at five: Lessons from the 2011 great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11, 167-178. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-020-00268-9
Mishra, S. V., Gayen, A., & Haque, S. M. (2020). COVID-19 and urban vulnerability in India. Habitat international, 103, 102230. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197397520305464
Mizutori, M. (2020). Reflections on the Sendai Framework for disaster risk reduction: Five years since its adoption. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(2), 147-151. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-020-00261-2
Nkwunonwo, U. C., Whitworth, M., & Baily, B. (2020). A review of the current status of flood modelling for urban flood risk management in the developing countries. Scientific African, 7, e00269. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227620300077
Pandey, R., Alatalo, J. M., Thapliyal, K., Chauhan, S., Archie, K. M., Gupta, A. K., Jha, S. K., & Kumar, M. (2018). Climate change vulnerability in urban slum communities: Investigating household adaptation and decision-making capacity in the Indian Himalaya. Ecological Indicators, 90, 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.031
Peters, D. J. (2020). Community susceptibility and resiliency to COVID?19 across the rural?urban continuum in the United States. The Journal of Rural Health, 36(3), 446-456. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jrh.12477
Sendai Framework for DRR. (n.d.). Risk Prevention Mitigation and Management Forum. Retrieved December 3, 2023, from https://riskavoider.com/drr-for-sustainable-development/sfdrr/
van Niekerk, D., Coetzee, C., & Nemakonde, L. (2020). Implementing the Sendai Framework in Africa: Progress against the targets (2015–2018). International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11, 179-189. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13753-020-00266-x
Vilar-Compte, M., Burrola-Méndez, S., Lozano-Marrufo, A., Ferré-Eguiluz, I., Flores, D., Gaitán-Rossi, P., ... & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (2021). Urban poverty and nutrition challenges associated with accessibility to a healthy diet: a global systematic literature review. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20, 1-19. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12939-020-01330-0
Wang, G., Xiao, C., Qi, Z., Meng, F., & Liang, X. (2021). Development tendency analysis for the water resource carrying capacity based on system dynamics model and the improved fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in the Changchun city, China. Ecological Indicators, 122, 107232. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X20311717
Wolff, E. (2021). The promise of a “people-centred” approach to floods: types of participation in the global literature of citizen science and community-based flood risk reduction in the context of the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science, 10, 100171. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061721000314
Yang, Z., Song, J., Cheng, D., Xia, J., Li, Q., & Ahamad, M. I. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation and scenario simulation for the water resources carrying capacity in Xi'an city, China. Journal of environmental management, 230, 221-233. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0301479718310958
Would you like to schedule a callback?
Send us a message and we will get back to you
Highlights
Earn While You Learn With Us
Confidentiality Agreement
Money Back Guarantee
Live Expert Sessions
550+ Ph.D Experts
21 Step Quality Check
100% Quality
24*7 Live Help
On Time Delivery
Plagiarism-Free
81 Isla Avenue Glenroy, Mel, VIC, 3046 AU
