COIT 20252 Business Process Management Report 3 Sample
You are required (as a group with three to four members) to write a report based on Siemens’ case study. This case study describes essential elements of the company’s business process implementation journey.
Case Study Reference:
Woli?ski, B, & Bala, S, 2018, ‘Comprehensive business process management at Siemens: Implementing business process excellence’, in J vom Brocke & J Mendling (eds), Business Process Management Cases: Digital Innovation and Business Transformation in Practice, pp. 111-124, Springer, Cham.
The above case study can be downloaded from the link provided on the Unit’s Moodle site. As a future Business Process Analyst, you are required to critically analyse the given case study and write a report that provides diverse insights into Siemens’ business process management (BPM) implementation processes. In doing so, you will emphasise the need for the project, actions taken to remedy the problems, the results achieved, and the lessons learnt, as depicted in the case study and other relevant scholarly sources.
For the main body of the report, you are advised to incorporate the four-part structure outlined below:
Part 1: Organisational Background
Some points to consider are:
- Insight into the organisation.
- Problems and challenges faced.
- Need for BPM initiatives.
- Conduct a SWOT analysis of Siemens’ business operations. (Refer to tutorial question 2.10 for the template using the Visual Paradigm Online tool).
Part 2: Process Analysis
Some points to consider are:
- Conduct a preliminary process analysis that provides a view of the functional processes.
- Evaluate the Centralised framework [Reference Process House (RPH)] with other relevant implementation frameworks.
- Discuss two other core processes, apart from sales and process execution.
- Assess the market threats of Siemens using Porter’s five forces model.
Part 3: BPM Methodologies
Some points to consider are:
- Pros and cons of the proposed BPM policy and comparison with similar policies globally.
- Implementation steps and evaluation with ABPMP’s BPM life cycle framework.
- BP excellence methods and how they align with the Lean methodology.
- Compare the as-is and to-be processes and draw a table showing the differences.
Part 4: Evaluation of BPM Implementation
Some points to consider are:
- Develop a business model canvas for Siemens (Refer to tutorial question 7.5 for the template). Explain the model.
- Draw a mind map using Miro (or another tool) that outlines areas improved, and discuss your diagram.
- Lessons learned - enablers and barriers of BPM implementation.
- Suggest cybersecurity measures in the project’s implementation.
The above points are provided as examples only and should not limit your reasoning and critical analysis. Please be mindful that you may find that all these points may not be relevant, so please exercise your own discretion. A thorough reading of the case study will enable you to identify the relevant points. Based on the identified shortcomings, you should provide the recommended improvements in the Conclusion section of the report.
Solution
Introduction
This report for university assignment help provides an in-depth analysis of Siemens' deployment of Business Process Management (BPM), a worldwide leader in technology and engineering solutions. The goal of this study is to assess the organization's adoption of BPM practises and their effect on improving efficiency and performance across different business processes. The report opens with an introduction of Siemens, covering its organisational history as well as the issues it faces in today's competitive business climate. It then goes into the need for BPM efforts, taking into account the highlighted issues and challenges. The research explores further into Siemens' implementation framework, especially the Centralised framework, and compares it to other comparable implementation frameworks. Aside from sales and process execution, the paper examines two main processes and analyses market risks using Porter's five forces model. It also investigates the proposed BPM policy, its benefits and drawbacks, and a comparison with comparable policies throughout the world. The study also discusses the implementation phases and assessment utilising the ABPMP's BPM life cycle framework, followed by a discussion of BP excellence methodologies and their alignment with the Lean methodology. A comparison of the as-is and to-be processes is offered, emphasising the differences, and lessons gained from BPM deployment, including enablers and hurdles, are explored. Lastly, the report finishes with suggestions for cybersecurity measures to guarantee the project's safe execution, taking Siemens' particular case study into account.
Part 1: Organisational Background
Insight into the organisation
Siemens is a multinational corporation with a primary emphasis on the areas of electrification, automation, and digitization. The organisation has a global reach spanning across 190 countries and a workforce of around 413,000 individuals, positioning it as a prominent manufacturer of energy-efficient technologies worldwide. Siemens is involved in multiple sectors, including but not limited to Power and Gas, Wind Power, Energy Management, Mobility, and Digital Factory (Siemens, 2023). The solutions provided by the company encompass the complete spectrum of electrification, including power generation, transmission, smart grid solutions, and medical imaging. Siemens employs a decentralised organisational structure, comprising of several distinct business units, each possessing a certain level of independence to address unique customer requirements. Nevertheless, the independent decision-making authority resulted in disjointed procedures and inadequate uniformity throughout the enterprise. Siemens undertook a comprehensive Business Process Management (BPM) initiative to tackle the aforementioned challenges (Britannica, 2023). The initiative prioritised process excellence and standardisation. The objective was to enhance efficacy, efficiency, and cooperation throughout all commercial procedures, resulting in heightened lucidity and harmonisation within the organisation. The implementation of this initiative has emerged as a fundamental component of Siemens' strategic outlook, bolstering the organization's sustained prosperity and enhancing its market position.
Figure 1: Siemens
(Source: Siemens, 2023)
Problems and challenges faced
Siemens is known as a global leader in the market, yet it has encountered number of challenges as mentioned below-
Disconnected Processes
Decentralisation of Siemens' structure may have led to disjointed processes among diverse business units. This lack of integration can lead to inefficiencies, redundancies, and difficulties in coordinating efforts.
Lack of Standardisation
The absence of standardisation in processes and procedures may have been a consequence of the independent operation of various business units. This can hinder collaboration, hinder scalability, and make it challenging to implement company-wide initiatives (Wolinski and Bala, 2018).
Complex Operations
Siemens engages in multifaceted operations across various industries and maintains a worldwide footprint. Managing such a complex organization with diverse products and services can be challenging. Managing operations across multiple regions, conforming to local regulations, and maintaining uniform quality standards can present considerable challenges.
Technological Advancements
Being a leader in electrification, automation, and digitization, Siemens must constantly stay ahead of technological advancements. Staying abreast of swift technological advancements, allocating resources towards research and development, and adapting business strategies to meet shifting market demands can pose significant challenges (Cozmiuc and Pettinger, 2021).
Talent Management
With over 413,000 employees worldwide, attracting and retaining top talent is crucial. Siemens could potentially encounter difficulties in the recruitment of proficient experts in specialised domains, as well as in guaranteeing a competent labour force to propel innovation and enhance competitiveness.
Market Competition
Siemens operates in highly competitive industries, where new entrants and existing competitors pose constant challenges. Sustaining market share, distinguishing oneself from rivals, and persistently innovating to maintain a competitive edge are perpetual obstacles encountered by the corporation.
Economic Factors
Economic fluctuations, geopolitical tensions, and regulatory changes can significantly impact Siemens' operations. Managing risks associated with economic factors and maintaining financial stability in a dynamic global landscape can be a considerable challenge (Krenkova et al., 2021).
Figure 2: Problems and challenges faced
(Source: Author, 2023)
Need for BPM Initiatives
As per the analysis of challenges faced by Siemens, the company felt the need of implementing the BPM initiatives which brings several benefits as mentioned below-
Process Integration and Alignment
Siemens operates with a decentralized structure, which can result in disconnected processes across business units. Business Process Management (BPM) initiatives have the potential to facilitate the integration and alignment of processes, thereby enhancing coordination, communication, and collaboration within the organisation. These results in enhanced overall performance, reduced redundancies, and improved efficiency (Lisovsky, 2019).
Standardization and Consistency
BPM initiatives have the potential to establish uniform processes and procedures across the entire organisation, thereby promoting standardisation and consistency. Through the establishment of accurate procedures and ideal techniques, Siemens can guarantee uniformity in its operations, quality, and customer service across diverse business divisions and geographical locations. This enables enhanced scalability, seamless integration during corporate reorganisations, and improved compliance with regulatory mandates.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Reduction
BPM initiatives have the potential to enhance operational efficiency and reduce costs by scrutinising and refining current processes, thereby detecting problems, inefficiencies, and opportunities for enhancement (Hanna, 2021). The optimisation of operations, automation of manual tasks, and elimination of redundant activities have the potential to enhance operational efficiency, decrease expenses, and enhance resource allocation.
Adaptability to Technological Advancements
Siemens exhibits a high degree of adaptability to technological advancements, as it operates within industries that are heavily influenced by such advancements. BPM initiatives can help the organization adapt to new technologies, such as automation, artificial intelligence, and data analytics. Through the synchronisation of procedures with nascent technologies, Siemens can exploit their capabilities to augment efficiency, stimulate originality, and maintain a competitive edge (ProServ, 2020).
Continuous Improvement Culture
Siemens can cultivate a culture of innovation and efficiency by promoting active employee involvement in process optimisation and equipping them with the requisite tools and methodologies. This results in continuous improvements in processes, heightened levels of employee involvement, and a competitive advantage in the marketplace.
Risk Mitigation and Compliance
Through the process of mapping and analysing, Siemens is able to detect potential weaknesses, establish suitable measures, and guarantee adherence to regulatory requirements (Syed et al., 2018). The implementation of this measure mitigates the likelihood of inaccuracies, sanctions for non-adherence, and harm to the organization's image.
Figure 3: BPM Initiatives
(Source: BPM Resources, 2023)
SWOT analysis of Siemens’ business operations
Table 1: SWOT analysis
Figure 4: SWOT
(Source: Author, 2023)
Part 2: Process Analysis
Preliminary process analysis that provides a view of the functional processes
A preliminary process analysis of Siemens' functional processes would include recognising and understanding the organisation's major processes. While the actual processes may vary depending on the unique business units and functions, below is an outline of some common Siemens functional processes-
Procurement Process
It includes seeking and procuring products and services needed by Siemens. It consists of actions such as supplier selection, negotiation, purchase order preparation, and products reception.
Manufacturing Process
This process includes the manufacture of Siemens' goods, which may include complicated machinery, equipment, or electronic gadgets. Design, engineering, production planning, material procurement, assembly, quality control, and shipment are all part of the process.
Sales and Marketing Process
This process focuses on marketing Siemens' goods and services, detecting client requirements, generating leads, and turning them into sales. Market research, product creation, pricing, advertising, sales order processing, and customer relationship management are all part of it (Kirchmer, 2017).
Process of R&D
This process encompasses innovation and the creation of new goods, technology, and solutions. It involves tasks including concept development, research, prototyping, testing, and cooperation with outside partners.
Human Resources (HR) Process
This process encompasses a variety of HR services including as recruiting, onboarding, performance management, training and development, pay and benefits, and employee relations.
Financial Management Process
This process includes operations such as financial planning, budgeting, accounting, and reporting. Financial analysis, cost control, cash flow management, and compliance with accounting standards and laws are all part of the job.
Service and Support Process
This process focuses on providing Siemens customers with after-sales service and support. Customer queries, technical assistance, warranty administration, and field service operations are all part of it (Kissflow, 2022).
Evaluation of the Centralised framework with other relevant implementation frameworks
The Centralised framework, also known as the Reference Process House (RPH), is an implementation framework that intends to offer an organisation with a standardised and centralised approach to process management. The comparison of the centralised framework with the other-
Decentralised Framework
In contrast to the centralised framework, the decentralised framework gives individual business units or departments greater autonomy in controlling their activities. Each unit may use its own process management techniques and tools, resulting in a lack of standardisation and coordination within the organisation (Moullin et al., 2020). While decentralisation may increase agility and responsiveness, it can also contribute to inefficiencies and inconsistent process execution.
Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)
CMMI is a framework for process improvement that focuses on analysing and improving an organization's process capacity. It outlines best practises and maturity levels to help guide process improvement initiatives. Unlike the Centralised framework, CMMI emphasises continuous process improvement based on organisational objectives and capabilities rather than a single centralised structure (Khraiwesh, 2020).
Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
BPR is a radical approach to process improvement that entails completely rethinking and rebuilding processes in order to achieve large performance gains. While BPR may result in revolutionary improvements, it often necessitates more resources and has greater risks than the Centralised structure (Dachyar and Miranda, 2019). The Centralised framework, on the other hand, emphasises standardisation and gradual improvements over whole process overhauls.
Agile Methodology
It includes Scrum or Kanban, is often employed in software development but may also be used to other operations. They value iterative and collaborative techniques that are flexible and adaptable. Agile approaches often perform well in dynamic and unpredictable contexts, allowing for rapid adaptation to changing needs (Cozmiuc and Pettinger, 2021). The Centralised framework, on the other hand, may be more appropriate for organisations wanting uniformity and control throughout their operations.
Two Other Core Processes
Apart from the sales and process execution, the 2-core process identified in the Siemens case study are-
R&D (Research and Development)
The R&D process is critical to Siemens' capacity to develop and remain competitive in the market. Siemens makes enormous investments in R&D to accelerate technical improvements and create innovative products and solutions. Identifying market requirements, doing research, producing prototypes, testing and verifying designs, and finally bringing new goods to market are all part of the R&D process (Wolinski and Bala, 2018). Siemens' emphasis on R&D allows them to develop novel solutions in a variety of areas, including energy, healthcare, and transportation. The company's dedication to R&D is obvious in its collaborations with universities and research organisations, as well as its extensive portfolio of patents and intellectual property.
Supply Chain Management
Siemens works in a complex global supply chain network that includes various suppliers, partners, and distribution channels. To guarantee timely and efficient delivery of goods and services to clients, effective supply chain management is critical. Siemens prioritises supply chain process optimisation to improve operational efficiency, decrease costs, and manage risks (Wolinski and Bala, 2018). Managing procurement, inventories, logistics, and supplier relationships are all part of the job. Siemens also prioritises environmental and ethical practises in its supply chain, guaranteeing regulatory compliance and supporting responsible procurement. Siemens can satisfy customer needs, minimise interruptions, and retain a competitive advantage in the market by successfully managing its supply chain.
Assess the market threats of Siemens using Porter’s five forces model
Porter’s 5 forces model is an effective tool to analyse the market threats that Siemens can implement, the 5 forces are as mentioned below-
Threat of New Entrants
The market for Siemens' products and services is distinguished by significant obstacles to entry, particularly in sectors such as energy, healthcare, and transportation, thereby posing a threat to new entrants. The formidable brand image of Siemens, coupled with its widespread international reach and substantial research and development expenditures, serve as barriers to entry for prospective competitors. Moreover, the intricacy of the sectors in which Siemens conducts its operations, coupled with the requirement for distinct proficiency and technological proficiencies, serves to curtail the potential danger posed by fresh contenders.
Bargaining Power of Buyers
Siemens caters to a heterogeneous customer base, encompassing governmental entities, sizable enterprises, and individual consumers, thereby affecting the bargaining power of buyers. The bargaining power of buyers varies depending on the industry and specific customer requirements. However, Siemens' strong market position and reputation often give them an advantage in negotiations (Kasi, 2019).
Bargaining Power of Suppliers
Siemens is reliant on a worldwide network of suppliers to procure components and materials for its product line, thereby affecting the bargaining power of said suppliers. The suppliers' bargaining power can be substantial, especially when they have exclusive or specialised resources (Scott, 2023). However, Siemens' size, long-standing relationships with suppliers, and its ability to source from multiple suppliers help mitigate this threat. Moreover, Siemens' emphasis on sustainability and ethical practices in its supply chain also contributes to its influence over suppliers.
Threat of Substitutes
Siemens operates in industries characterised by dynamic technological advancements and innovations, thereby posing a potential threat of substitutes. The threat of substitutes exists, particularly as new technologies emerge. However, Siemens' strong R&D capabilities, extensive patent portfolio, and focus on continuous innovation act as barriers to potential substitutes (Kasi, 2019).
Competitive Rivalry
Siemens encounters competitive rivalry from other prominent multinational corporations operating within its targeted sectors. Prominent contenders in the market include General Electric, ABB, and Philips. The degree of competitive rivalry exhibits heterogeneity across diverse market segments and geographic regions. Siemens' competitive advantage is attributed to its broad range of products, technological prowess, and well-established customer connections (embaPRO, 2022).
Figure 5: porter 5 forces analysis
(Source: Zhukova, 2021)
Part 3: BPM Methodologies
Pros and cons of the proposed BPM policy and comparison with similar policies globally
There are several Pros and Cons of the BPM policy as mentioned below-
Pros
Standardisation and Efficiency- The implementation of a Business Process Management (BPM) policy enables Siemens to achieve standardisation and efficiency in its business processes across multiple departments and locations. This promotes efficiency by eliminating redundant activities, streamlining workflows, and ensuring consistent execution of processes (Relos, 2018). The implementation of this technology facilitates Siemens in attaining enhanced productivity, cost reduction, and improved operational performance.
Transparency and Accountability- The BPM policy emphasizes process visibility and accountability. Through the establishment of well-defined roles, responsibilities, and ownership of processes, it can be ensured that personnel possess a clear comprehension of their assigned duties and expected outcomes (Henshall, 2019). The implementation of transparency facilitates the identification of challenges, measurement of performance, and implementation of requisite improvements.
Continuous Improvement- The BPM policy promotes a culture of continuous improvement by implementing mechanisms for monitoring, measuring, and analyzing process performance. The utilisation of this approach allows Siemens to identify potential areas for improvement, execute remedial measures, and foster innovative practises (Figueiredo, 2022).
Risk Mitigation and Compliance- The implementation of a Business Process Management (BPM) policy enables Siemens to identify and mitigate risks through the documentation and standardisation of processes, thereby promoting compliance. The implementation of necessary controls, adherence to regulatory requirements, and ensuring compliance with industry standards are facilitated by this approach adopted by the company.
Cons
Resistance to Change- Implementing a BPM policy requires changes in work practices and employee behavior. Resistance to change from employees and managers can pose challenges in the adoption and implementation of the policy. Overcoming resistance and achieving widespread acceptance may necessitate substantial communication, training, and change management endeavours.
Flexibility and Agility- The utilisation of Business Process Management (BPM) provides notable benefits such as standardisation and efficiency. However, it is important to note that there exists a possible compromise with flexibility and agility. The inflexibility of processes may impede the capacity to promptly respond to alterations in the market or requests from customers (Relos, 2018). Siemens needs to strike a balance between standardization and the need for flexibility in certain situations to remain agile in a dynamic business environment.
Comparison with similar policies globally
Siemens' proposed business process management (BPM) policy may be subject to comparative analysis with analogous policies that have been implemented by other companies on a global scale. The efficacy and ramifications of the policy may fluctuate contingent upon the magnitude of the organisation, the sector in which it operates, and its particular goals. Several organisations have effectively executed BPM strategies and attained advantages such as heightened productivity, reduced expenses, and elevated customer contentment. However, challenges in policy adoption, resistance to change, and cultural factors can also be observed across different organizations. BPM policies have been implemented by multinational corporations such as General Electric, IBM, and Procter & Gamble on a global scale in order to enhance operational excellence and facilitate process improvement.
Implementation steps and evaluation with ABPMP’s BPM life cycle framework
The ABPMP BPM life cycle framework is a well-known method for executing BPM projects. It is divided into six stages, discovery, design, modelling, execution, monitoring, and optimisation. The steps for implementing the suggested BPM policy utilising the ABPMP BPM life cycle framework is as mentioned below-
Discovery Phase
The organisation must define the need for the BPM policy, review the current processes, and create goals and objectives during the discovery phase.
Design Phase
The organisation must create the new processes and systems that will support the BPM policy during this phase. This might include reengineering procedures and developing new IT systems (Malak, 2023).
Modelling Phase
The organisation must construct process models that represent the new processes and systems during this phase. This will aid in the identification of any problems in the design before it is implemented.
Execution Phase
The organisation must apply the new procedures and systems during the execution phase. Employees may be trained, work positions may be changed, and IT systems may be updated (Jain, 2021).
Monitoring Phase
During this phase, the organisation must monitor the new processes and systems to verify they are working properly. This might include gathering and analysing data to find areas for improvement (Malak, 2023).
Optimisation Phase
During the optimisation phase, the organisation must continuously enhance the new processes and systems. This might include using data analytics to identify areas for improvement and applying improvements to procedures and systems.
Figure 6: BPM life cycle
(Source: Izoe.in, 2019)
The organisation should utilise key performance indicators (KPIs) to track progress towards the goals and objectives specified in the discovery phase to evaluate the success of the BPM strategy. These KPIs should be linked to the ABPMP BPM life cycle framework's various stages. Employee training completion rates and system uptime, for example, might be KPIs for the execution phase. Process cycle durations and mistake rates may be KPIs for the monitoring phase. Process improvement rates and customer satisfaction levels may be used as KPIs during the optimisation phase.
BP excellence methods and their alignment with the Lean methodology
The Siemens case study demonstrates the application of several business process excellence methodologies by the organisation to improve their operational procedures. The methodologies encompassed in this category are Business Process Management (BPM), Lean methodology, and Six Sigma.
Business Process Management (BPM)
It is an organised strategy utilised to effectively manage and enhance business processes. The primary objective of this approach is to ensure that organisational processes are in harmony with the overarching goals, thereby enhancing operational efficiency and facilitating ongoing enhancement. Business Process Management (BPM) places significant emphasis on enhancing process visibility, standardisation, and control (Harmon, 2020). The framework offers a systematic approach to designing, modelling, executing, monitoring, and optimising processes. The alignment between BPM and Lean methodology can be observed in the subsequent manners-
Process Optimisation
The optimisation of processes is a common goal shared by both Business Process Management (BPM) and Lean methodologies. The objective is to eliminate any unnecessary steps or resources, minimise process variability, and enhance overall efficiency. The focus is on optimising workflows and removing activities that do not contribute to the overall value of the process.
Customer Focus
Both Lean methodology and BPM prioritise the satisfaction and value delivered to customers. Organisations are encouraged to comprehend the requirements of their customers and subsequently synchronise their processes in accordance with those needs (Harmon, 2020).
Continuous Improvement
The principles of continuous improvement are espoused by both Lean and Business Process Management (BPM), as they advocate for the establishment of a culture that prioritises ongoing enhancement. It is recommended that organisations engage in periodic evaluations and enhancements of their processes in order to attain improved outcomes.
Lean Methodology
The Lean Methodology is a management philosophy that prioritises the optimisation of customer value and the minimization of waste. The objective is to establish a seamless process and eradicate any tasks that do not contribute to the overall value (Thanki and Thakkar, 2020). The principles of Lean methodology are consistent with the BP excellence methods in the subsequent manners-
Waste Reduction
The reduction of waste is a shared objective between Lean methodology and BP excellence methods. The individuals in question engage in the identification and subsequent removal of diverse types of waste, including but not limited to overproduction, defects, waiting time, and unnecessary transportation.
Value Stream Mapping
It is a technique employed by the Lean methodology to examine and depict the movement of materials and information within a given process. This is consistent with the process modelling and analysis techniques utilised in Business Process Management (BPM) to identify opportunities for enhancement (Shaturaev and Bekimbetova, 2021).
Employee Engagement
The significance of employee involvement in process improvement initiatives is emphasised by both Lean and BPM methodologies. The collaboration promotion of teamwork, collaboration, and empowerment is suggested in order to facilitate innovation and enhance efficiency.
Siemens tried to establish a sturdy framework for process optimisation, waste reduction, and continuous improvement by integrating BP excellence methods, such as BPM, with Lean methodology. The integration assisted the optimisation of operations, enhancement of customer value, and achieving higher levels of efficiency across the entire organisation.
Comparison of as-is and to-be processes
The "to-be" processes demonstrate a significant improvement over the "as-is" processes in various aspects. They exhibit enhanced process visibility, ownership, efficiency, integration, and customer focus. Additionally, the introduction of technology integration, standardized quality measures, performance metrics, and change management initiatives reflect a more structured and optimized approach to business processes.
Table 2: Comparison of as-is and to-be processes
Business model canvas for Siemens
Customer Segments- Siemens serves a diverse range of customer segments including industries such as energy, healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing, as well as governments and cities.
Value Proposition- Siemens offers innovative and sustainable solutions in areas like electrification, automation, digitalization, and mobility. Their value proposition lies in providing reliable and efficient technologies that address their customers' specific needs and contribute to sustainable development.
Channels- Siemens utilizes various channels including direct sales, distributors, partners, and digital platforms to reach and engage with customers. They also offer after-sales services and support.
Customer Relationships- Siemens aims to build long-term relationships with customers by understanding their requirements, providing personalized solutions, and offering ongoing support.
Revenue Streams- Siemens generates revenue through the sale of products, solutions, and services. They also have revenue streams from long-term service contracts and licensing agreements.
Key Activities- Siemens engages in activities such as research and development, manufacturing, project management, and service delivery to create value for their customers.
Key Resources- Siemens' key resources include their technological expertise, research and development capabilities, manufacturing facilities, and a skilled workforce.
Key Partnerships- Siemens collaborates with various partners, including suppliers, technology providers, universities, and research institutions, to enhance their offerings and expand their reach.
Cost Structure- Siemens incurs costs related to research and development, manufacturing, distribution, marketing, and maintaining their operations and infrastructure.
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Figure 7: business model canvas
(Source: Author, 2023)
Mind map outlining areas improved
BPM (Business Process Management) is a comprehensive method to managing and enhancing an organization's business processes. It entails analysing, planning, executing, and continually optimising processes in order to improve efficiency, productivity, and customer satisfaction. BPM is fundamentally concerned with aligning people, technology, and systems in order to accomplish strategic objectives and promote operational excellence. Process mapping, workflow automation, performance assessment, and process optimisation are all part of it. BPM strives to foster a culture of continuous improvement and agility, allowing businesses to adapt to changing market needs and promote long-term success. BPM helps organisations simplify operations, remove bottlenecks, decrease costs, and improve overall company performance by visualising and controlling end-to-end processes.
Figure 8: Mind map of BPM
(Source: Author, 2023)
Lessons learned - enablers and barriers of BPM implementation
During the implementation of Business Process Management (BPM), several lessons can be learned from both enablers and barriers encountered throughout the process.
Enablers of BPM implementation-
Executive Support- Strong support and active involvement from top management are crucial for successful BPM implementation. Executives should champion the initiative, allocate necessary resources, and drive the organizational change (Mehta, 2023).
Stakeholder Engagement- Involving and engaging stakeholders throughout the BPM journey promotes buy-in, collaboration, and a shared understanding of the benefits and goals of the initiative.
Process Documentation and Analysis- Thoroughly documenting and analyzing existing processes provide insights into inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and improvement opportunities, forming the foundation for process redesign (Mehta, 2023).
Continuous Improvement Culture- The establishment of a culture of continuous improvement is known to promote active participation of employees in generating ideas and innovations, thereby creating a dynamic and adaptable environment for business process management.
Figure 9: Enablers of BPM implementation
(Source: Author, 2023)
Barriers to BPM implementation-
Resistance to Change- Resistance from employees, particularly when it comes to altering established processes and routines, can impede BPM implementation. Effective change management strategies, including communication and training, are essential to overcome resistance (Lawton, 2022).
Lack of Resources and Expertise- Insufficient resources, both in terms of personnel and technology, can hinder BPM implementation. Adequate investment in tools, technology, and skilled personnel is critical for successful implementation.
Inadequate Performance Measurement- Without clear performance metrics and measurement systems, it becomes difficult to assess the impact and success of BPM initiatives. Establishing relevant and measurable metrics ensures progress tracking and continuous improvement (Lawton, 2022).
Failure to Sustain Momentum- BPM implementation should be viewed as an ongoing journey rather than a one-time project. Sustaining the momentum and commitment to continuous improvement is essential for long-term success.
Figure 10: Barriers to BPM implementation
(Source: Author, 2023)
Recommendations of cybersecurity measures in the project’s implementation
To ensure the security and protection of the project's implementation in the Siemens case study, below mentioned recommendations for cybersecurity measures can be considered-
Risk Assessment and Management- Perform a thorough risk assessment to identify possible cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities unique to the project. Create a risk management strategy that provides methods for successfully mitigating and responding to recognised hazards (ClickUp, 2023).
Implement strong access control methods- to prohibit unauthorised access to sensitive data and systems. To guarantee that only authorised workers have access to vital information, establish strong password rules, multi-factor authentication, and role-based access restrictions.
Regular Security Training and Awareness- Conduct regular cybersecurity training and awareness programmes to educate staff and stakeholders on best practises for protecting sensitive data. Training on recognising and reporting possible security events and phishing attempts should be included (Donato, 2021).
System Updates and Patch Management- Maintain all systems, applications, and software with the most recent security patches and updates. Apply patches and security upgrades on a regular basis to fix known vulnerabilities and guard against new threats.
Implement network segmentation- to separate vital systems and data from less secure regions of the network. This aids in the containment of possible breaches and the propagation of cyberattacks.
Incident response plan- Develop a well-defined incident response strategy outlining the measures to be done in the case of a cybersecurity issue. This covers protocols for incident containment, investigation, communication, and recovery in order to reduce the effect of an event and guarantee a quick reaction (Wrike, 2020).
Security Audits and Testing on a Regular Basis- Conduct periodic security audits and vulnerability assessments to discover any flaws or holes in security procedures. Perform penetration testing to assess the efficacy of the security mechanisms that have been installed.
Figure 11: recommendations of cyber security measures
(Source: Swanagan, 2021)
Conclusion
Siemens' introduction of Business Process Management (BPM) has proved to be a major step towards improving efficiency and performance across a variety of business processes. Siemens has effectively solved critical obstacles and enhanced process execution, customer happiness, and operational efficiency by implementing a centralised framework and integrating BPM practises. Despite its shortcomings, the proposed BPM strategy has given a good framework for process improvement projects. Siemens guaranteed an organised approach to installation and assessment by adhering to the ABPMP's BPM life cycle architecture. The combination of BP excellence practises with the Lean methodology has resulted in even more simplified operations and waste reduction. The implementation process has taught us the value of strong leadership support, stakeholder involvement, and effective change management. Strong cybersecurity measures and proactive risk mitigation tactics are needed to ensure the project's success. Overall, Siemens' road to BPM excellence is a fascinating case study for organisations looking to optimise their processes and create long-term success via effective BPM strategies.
Limitations of the report
The limitations of the report are-
Scope Limitations- The research focuses on the Siemens case study and may not cover BPM adoption across sectors or organisations. Siemens-specific discoveries and suggestions may not apply elsewhere.
Data availability- The report uses case study data, which may be incomplete, inaccurate, or outdated. Lack of data or real-time updates may hinder analysis and insights.
Generalisability- The study discusses Siemens' BPM implementation's pros and cons, but every company is different. BPM projects may succeed or fail depending on organisational culture, industry dynamics, and external influences.
Time constraints- The report's time constraints may limit investigation and prohibit a complete BPM implementation study. Due to time limits, certain interests or insights may have been neglected.
Subjectivity- The report represents information interpretation and analysis. Different case study interpretations may lead to different findings or suggestions.
References
BPM Resources. (2023). Scope of BPM Initiatives. [online] Available at: http://www.what-is-bpm.com/get_started/scope_of_bpm_initiatives.html [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Britannica (2023). Siemens AG | History & Facts . In: Britannica. [online] Available at: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Siemens-AG [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Cflow. (2023). Understanding the As is-To be Process Analysis in Process Improvement | Cflow. [online] Available at: https://www.cflowapps.com/as-is-to-be-process-analysis-in-process-improvement/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
ClickUp. (2023). 10 Ways to Improve Cybersecurity in Project Management | ClickUp. [online] Available at: https://clickup.com/blog/cybersecurity-project-management/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Cozmiuc, D.C. and Pettinger, R., 2021. Consultants' Tools to Manage Digital Transformation: The Case of PWC, Siemens, and Oracle. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 23(4), pp.1-29.
Cozmiuc, D.C. and Pettinger, R., 2021. Consultants' Tools to Manage Digital Transformation: The Case of PWC, Siemens, and Oracle. Journal of Cases on Information Technology (JCIT), 23(4), pp.1-29.
Dachyar, M. and Miranda, G.S., 2019, January. Design On Improvement of Distribution Process in Logistic Service Provider Companies Using Business Process Reengineering Approach. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, 90?97.
Donato, H. (2021). Top Data Security Measures Every Project Manager Must Implement. [online] project-management.com. Available at: https://project-management.com/types-of-data-security-measures-every-project-manager-must-implement/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
embaPRO. (2022). Siemens AG Porter Five Forces Analysis. [online] Available at: https://embapro.com/frontpage/porterfiveanalysis/7728-siemens-ag [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Figueiredo, M. (2022). What is BPM? The benefits of Business Process Management - Jestor. [online] Jestor. Available at: https://jestor.com/blog/business-process-management/what-is-bpm-the-benefits-of-business-process-management/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Goh, M. and Goh, Y.M., 2019. Lean production theory-based simulation of modular construction processes. Automation in Construction, 101, pp.227-244.
Hanna, K.T. (2021). Business Process Management Initiative (BPMI). [online] CIO. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/definition/Business-Process-Management-Initiative-BPMI [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Harmon, P. (2020). Lean and Business Process Management | BPTrends. [online] Bptrends.com. Available at: https://www.bptrends.com/lean-and-business-process-management/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Henshall, A. (2019). 9 Benefits of Business Process Management (BPM) and Why You’ll Love It | Process Street | Checklist, Workflow and SOP Software. [online] Process Street. Available at: https://www.process.st/benefits-of-bpm-business-process-management/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Izoe.in. (2019). What is Business Process Management BPM Solutions? [online] Available at: https://www.izoe.in/blog/what-is-business-process-management-bpm-solutions [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Jain, S. (2021). 5 Steps in a Business Process Management Life cycle – Customer... [online] Customer Service Blog from HappyFox – Improve Customer Service & Experience. Available at: https://blog.happyfox.com/steps-in-business-process-management-life-cycle/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Kasi, A. (2019). Porter Five Forces Analysis (Porter Model) of Siemens - Porter Analysis. [online] Porter Analysis. Available at: https://www.porteranalysis.com/porter-five-forces-analysis-porter-model-of-siemens/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Khraiwesh, M., 2020. Measures of Organizational Training in the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI®). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(2), pp.584-592.
Kirchmer, M., 2017. High performance through business process management. West Chester: Springer.
Kissflow (2022). Business Process Analysis - Techniques, Benefits, Tools | Kissflow. [online] Kissflow.com. Available at: https://kissflow.com/workflow/bpm/business-process-analysis/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
K?enková, E., Rieser, K. and Sato, A., 2021. How software robots can facilitate the procurement process? A case study of Siemens in the Czech Republic. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(3), pp.191-203.
Lawton, G. (2022). 7 business process management challenges and how to fix them. [online] CIO. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/searchcio/tip/7-business-process-management-challenges-and-how-to-fix-them [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Lisovsky, A.L., 2019. Sustainable development and business process management. ?????????????? ??????? ? ????-??????????, 10(3), pp.228-237.
Lucidchart. (2018). The Basics of Documenting and Analyzing Your As-Is Process. [online] Available at: https://www.lucidchart.com/blog/as-is-process-analysis#:~:text=Simply%20put%2C%20as%2Dis%20maps,be%20phase%20of%20process%20management. [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Malak, H.A. (2023). BPM Lifecycle: 5 Stages to Business Process Excellence. [online] Theecmconsultant. Available at: https://theecmconsultant.com/what-is-bpm-lifecycle/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Mehta, S. (2023). From Chaos to Control: 7 Enablers for Business Process Management. [online] Linkedin. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-chaos-control-7-enablers-business-process-management-mehta/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Moullin, J.C., Dickson, K.S., Stadnick, N.A., Albers, B., Nilsen, P., Broder-Fingert, S., Mukasa, B. and Aarons, G.A., 2020. Ten recommendations for using implementation frameworks in research and practice. Implementation science communications, 1, pp.1-12.
Petrisor, I. and Cozmiuc, D., 2020. Global supply chain management organization at siemens in the advent of industry 4.0. In Supply Chain and logistics management: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 1095-1114). IGI Global.
ProServ (2020). 5 Steps for Successful BPM Initiatives - ProServ - Medium. [online] Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/@proserv2003/5-steps-for-successful-bpm-initiatives-af365ea92357 [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Relos, D. (2018). Pros and Cons of Business Process Management (BPM) - Proceso Pro. [online] Proceso Pro. Available at: https://proceso.pro/en/blog/pros-and-cons-of-business-process-management-bpm/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Scott, G. (2023). Porter’s 5 Forces Explained and How to Use the Model. [online] Investopedia. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/porter.asp [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Shaturaev, J. and Bekimbetova, G., 2021. Transformation of business efficiency with the lean management. Deutsche Internationale Zeitschrift für zeitgenössische Wissenschaft, (22), pp.71-73.
Siemens. (2023). Siemens History. [online] Available at: https://www.siemens.com/global/en/company/about/history.html [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Swanagan, M. (2021). Purplesec. [online] PurpleSec. Available at: https://purplesec.us/network-security-plan/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Syed, R., Bandara, W., French, E. and Stewart, G., 2018. Getting it right! Critical success factors of BPM in the public sector: a systematic literature review. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 22, pp.1-39.
Thanki, S. and Thakkar, J.J., 2020. An investigation on lean–green performance of Indian manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(3), pp.489-517.
Woli?ski, B. and Bala, S., 2018. Comprehensive business process management at siemens: Implementing business process excellence. Business Process Management Cases: Digital Innovation and Business Transformation in Practice, pp.111-124.
Wrike. (2020). Why Should I Use Security Features in Project Management Software? [online] Available at: https://www.wrike.com/project-management-guide/faq/why-should-i-use-security-features-in-project-management-software/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].
Zhukova, N. (2021). Understanding Porter’s Five Forces Model (How to Use It). [online] Semrush . Available at: https://www.semrush.com/blog/understanding-porters-five-forces-model/ [Accessed 11 May 2023].